Відео

Cause they bruthas ..

I don’t believe India’s minimum age is more than $2 an hour but otherwise a good documentary.

Christ this is depressing. But it’s laughable to think that Zuckerberg was behind any of the changes to Facebook and its transformation into what it became. That was DARPA and Peter Thiel. What has this supposed genius Zuck invented since?

Thanks give me something to mull over. Subscribed 👍

Cyberpunk world without the aesthetic.

3 hours well spent!

The country that gave the world ww1 and ww2, as well as the concentration camps? Who really gives a damn about germanys history. Actually, they shouldnt exist as a country, considering "all germany gave the world".

here's the fun part, when the point is reached where almost everything is Ai generated, what data will be used to train it with? My guess is extra fingers everywhere :D

id recommend purchasing a standalone clip on mic for the real life, central London shots SUPPORT CONSUMERISM <.>

Every empire builder and colonial master built on this great mystical notion that the indigenous and native population of colonialism benefitted from their land occupation, without the arrival of colonialism, they would live in poverty and in extreme hardship in perpetuity. 😂😁

The whole idea that these people were at once responsible for their condition but that it is also genetically predetermined so there’s nothing anyone can do to fix it is completely contradictory at its fundamentals 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️ It’s EITHER someone’s fault/responsibility that they’re in their situation OR it’s genetically predetermined and no one can do anything about it, it can’t be both since people don’t choose their inherent genetics ffs

Just an FYI: API=Application Programming Interface (38:42)

I think this is the best video so far to discuss the theft of AI. It's not just about using artist's work without their consent, it's also about whether they will be replaced in the future. It's not just about stealing from first world artists, it's also about the exploitation of third world citizens whose labor made this technology possible. And it doesn't ignore the genuine good AI may create for us, either. This is my favorite video on the topic so far. Thank you!

You stole my watch time. This video auto played after I fell asleep.

This is an amazing video. Thank you for your long, high-quality, informative video

look if machines replace every job than it points to the necessity of humans to work which is a stapple of the actual economy but might not be one in the next ... meaning if no one has a income or job then who will buy the products and with what? ... it might be a problem in the old model of economy but not a problem in the next economy ... which will have to change obviously into something new if no one has a job because everything at the limit of this reasoning has been replaced by machines .. the transition is going to be horrible tho as part of the old model is maintained as the new one rolls in

He went from based to bad.

They are never going to cite sources. That's literally how all this stuff works. It gets merged in together with everything else and you have no idea what went where. If you keep everything separated out where you can source it, then it's just Google (or a search engine). Which honestly is better than AI anyway. I want to know where my information is coming from.

Yes, to those Egalitarians that the term, Hegelatarianism/s is ABSOLUTELY appropriate. Anybody...I Kant remember the author of Leviathan...my brother stole my manuscript of a novel I entitled, "Crime And Punushment". It was based upon our two lives. Therefore, I guess that is why he was imprisoned. A kopper* for a thought? * One Kopper (Copeck) is worth 10-15 Putin's/(years in the gulag) Formally valued at 100 equaled the lowest denomination of what is now called a Ruble. Though, this unit of measure is devaluing swiftly as compared to so very many other country's currencies.

Peterson is liberal, in the American sense (I know that he is Canadians) and not conservative or "right wing." He was joking. He is only "conservative" in that the supposed moderate left radicalized.

I wouldn’t say you are 100% of shit, but rather 75%💩 Russel Brand have been right almost every topic he has covered.

It's pronounced ver BAY tim

The sequel we didn't deserve to how the internet was stolen, I love your work thank you for all those videos

Make then smaller pls. 1hr max. Jeez. Is it a test?

2:35:18. Who is ‘Her’ ?

You judgementally attack AI as fake with a pushover. What a joke like most British accents thinking their air of superiority in wisdom lays in their generationally stolen or fake assimilation of the rich textured articulate stylistic sound of colonial empire rarher than holistic critique and departure from coddling elites and their wantons of mere civil allegations. Civil allegations are wobblers at best given standards of evidence and opinions thresholds required on either side. OpenAI is hardly just or targetting resell copyrighted works, rather like youtube long proven controversial model fully staked in US fair use doctrine for discoursing around copyrighted works exempts liability and provides a much less monorchical society like we yanks prefer. This is what Aaron Schwartz would have wanted and countless other virtuous hackers and disruptive piblishers. Game over for bs elites and IP gambits.

Suing them for copyright was not going to help openness.

this is a&& long. now i have expanded ai knowledge.

hats off

Does every generation just rehash the rehash? This book idea got way out of control. Your addicts.

stolen work.... you people make me sick If i put something up an image of myself on Facebook for all to see and AI was trained using Facebook images, is that also stealing. If i breath the air in front of ur face i bet ud call that stealing too. PRG BMRS, ND THR KD"S LK Y KLLD MRC

9:25 ua-cam.com/video/EnaKtu-VcOM/v-deo.htmlsi=iCLonr4qX-DIaepn

AI is sounding like it will lead to Tower of Babel 2.0 or 3.0+ depending on how old and if Gobekli Tepe and the Great Pyramids are the same age. I mean, a giant 3-D printer or similar tech could make a helluvan accurate pyramid or....

Call me stupid, dumb, or whatever you will, but I don't understand some of these concerns. For example, is it necessary to produce 9 varieties of toilet paper: white, pink, blue, beige, with 2 or 3 or 4 plies, wide or narrower, and so on? No, but does it create more pollution depending on any of these factors? Again no. So what does consumerism have to do with it? Another example: About 20 years ago, each CD was housed in a heavy plastic shell. Very bad environmentally and completely unnecessary. Consumers protested, and CD are no longer sold like that. So that was an ethical decision that had some meaning & impact. Commendable. But if the new cardboards casing come in various colors instead of just gray or light brown, does that mean that we succumbed to consumerism? I think not. And examples abound. The shoes Van Gogh painted, some said, connected the viewer to dire poverty and hardships of field workers. Really? By contrast, Andy Warhol colorful, frivolous shoes do not connect us to anything. Should they? Are some landscape paintings more socially ethical than others? Do we need to call one art and the other frivolous art? What nonsense. This is not a criticism of the segment. It is criticism of many of the sociologists who were discussed in the segment. Thanks for the program.

Long story short, if you believe life is precious and fast-moving towards old age and frailty, I suggest not going past basecamp on the climb to understanding Hegel, for there are other mountains with far more rewarding views, and those won't expect you to take their word for it. Byung Chul Han's The Burnout Society is hot right now, and the lectures on Thomas Sugrue's channel are sublime scholarship.

Hegel was in vogue generation after generation, but he also fell out of favor in the same span of time. Any all-reaching philosophical system that promises absolute truth is as seductive as ever. Platonists refuse to take the hint that they've been wrong about a pure rational order, or a pure conceptual reality for that matter. It's pareidolia. It's also an over-attachment to purity, something which goes hand in hand with idealism, and totalitarianism. Never again. We're messy and irreducible to pure concepts, and philosophy is closer to happening on the toilet bowl than any doctoral thesis. Rodin's Thinker is what the French philosophers got right.

I'm still waiting for someone to give me a reason to suspect that LLMs can even improve. It would seem to me that more data does not, by default, lead to better writing. I also don't totally see why more nodes would do so either. Also, if AI is learning from AI it will compound AIs generic blandness. I think it would actually have to become self aware to improve. I have yet to see a single person give a creible answer as to how they plan to do that.

So much litteral idiots in the comments; either make a salient critique or shut up, Hegel obviously has a coherent system which works for what it does; just because you can't understand doesn't mean the Dialectic is completely bunk.

Its interesting that computers always had one thing that beat us, even from the 90, and its the compute speed, getting those math calculated in the blink of an eyes, the reason of their existence, if they can get the remaining features, it will be scary because we will never get the compute as good, Also amazing video, this is amazing info

It is important to note here that "Fair use" applies to _copyright_ only,. Copyright infringement and _plagiarism_ are *_not_* the same thing! I'll give two examples below: Shakespeare's works are now out of copyright and therefore free to copy, change all the words to synonyms and publish. However, if you did that to one play and put your own name on it, that would still be plagiarism. Weird Al makes parody versions of other contemporary songs by other musicians, and he can do that because it is "Fair use" to do so. But he is not allowed to claim that "White and Nerdy" or "Like a Surgeon" are his original compositions.

Congratulations. You have perfectly misunderstood The ONE, the substance of Spinoza. Spinoza’s Non-Dualistic ‘Nature’ has NOTHING to do with Panpsychism. A little less ‘Eurocentric’ approach, scouting just a little bit into Advaita Vedanta or Mahayana Buddhism would help to understand Spinoza.

Very evil people. Left church on Sunday to go watch a person being lynched. 🤢

amazing as always i dont know what to say :) when i get steady income ill make a patreon account just for you :]

1h20m : This isn’t an AI problem, this is a corporate law problem.

I really cannot stand the American definitions and segments. Its so off putting Ill say it affects me negatively so I will remove myself from your content. This video is also so repetitive. Its the same idea over and over and over again. Just read Spinoza and you'll get the same answers as having another man just repeating his work over and over and over again.

I think we should allow AI to be able to train on copyrighted material, if and only if AI becomes open source and the companies are transparent to the public.

It’s very obvious that these AI companies want regulation to have authority and control over how AI develops and this is not a good thing. They are calling for it because it’s good for their pockets not for the people.

Thank you for this. Fully appreciate it.

Amazing 👏 Commenting for the algorithm overlords

I don care dude, i just wanna a baddie self aware bot waifu with bihtc personality from the hood